Jan
24

Death of Student Highlights Risks of Distracted Driving

A sad but timely reminder of the risks posed by the increasing use of connected technology by young drivers.  The Deseret News in Utah writes about the death of Taylor Sauer.

The 18-year-old gave a classmate a ride back to Utah State University in Logan, before beginning the return trip to her home in Caldwell, Idaho.

Taylor apparently passed the time on the long drive by communicating with others on Facebook.

“I can’t discuss this matter now. Driving and facebooking is not safe! Haha,” she posted on the social networking website Facebook at 8:48 p.m.

Moments later, Sauer was dead, killed after the Saturn Vue she was driving collided with a tanker truck and was then hit by a semi truck moments later.

The crash remains under investigation, and Police would not confirm if distracted driving played a factor. But Sauer’s family has its own opinions.

“We know through Taylor’s Facebook account that she was actively in a conversation 12 to 15 minutes before the accident occurred,” Warr said. “We know that Taylor had done that in the past, and we know, as a family, that that probably or may have contributed to the accident.”

A study by University of Utah psychology professor David Strayer found that talking on a cellphone while driving leads to an impairment level equivalent to that of drunkenness. When texting, an individual is twice as impaired, the 2006 study concluded.

“It’s really unfortunate,” Strayer said of Sauer’s death. “We’re seeing a greater and greater trend for this sort of stuff. There’s no doubt about it that distractions are growing.”

Strayer said advances in technology and the installation of more devices in automobiles are exacerbating the problem.

“Clearly these technologies have a capability of really making the crash risk go up,” Strayer said. “I think the problem is a lot of this stuff is flashy and kind of exciting … Just because it’s fun to do, doesn’t mean it’s safe to do.”

The National Transportation Safety Board issued a unanimous recommendation last month that all states impose a ban on cellphone use while driving, including communication on hands-free devices. The measure would be more stringent than legislation in place in any state, including Utah, which passed its own careless driving law in 2009.

Read the full Article:  http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705397536/Death-of-USU-student-in-Idaho-points-to-risks-of-distracted-driving.html?pg=1

 

Permanent link to this article: http://blog.blank-it.com/death-of-student-highlights-risks-of-distracted-driving/

Jan
16

A Current Affair On Distracted Driving

One of Australia’s top-rating programs, Channel 9′s “A Current Affair” has broadcast an interesting feature on the dangers of Distracted Driving in Australia.

Featuring interviews with academic experts and law enforcement representatives, the piece also includes a practical demonstration, using a driving simulator, of the effects of texting on driver behaviour and reaction times.

View a video of the broadcast here: http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/article/8402146/texting-driver-danger

As with most broadcast media, the emphasis in this piece is on texting and cellphone use, but all of the most dangerous distraction characteristics also apply to the increasing use of computers and laptops by the mobile workforce.

This update has been brought to you by Blank-IT, the original and best in-vehicle computer distracted driving solution.  To find out how we can help your company address your legislative and OH&S requirements, contact Blank-IT on +61 8 9486 7122.

Permanent link to this article: http://blog.blank-it.com/a-current-affair-on-distracted-driving/

Jan
12

Distracted Driving in the News – January 2012

An update on recent articles related to Distracted Driving:

In this update we feature two interesting pieces:

  • a New York Times article raising the question of insurance and distracted driving related accidents;
  • a study claiming to show just how much more dangerous mp3/entertainment devices are than cellphones when it comes to distraction

What if Insurers Didn’t Pay Up For Texting Crashes?

The ‘Bucks’ blog on the New York Times discusses a proposal that insurance companies could help prevent distracted driving if they refused to pay claims for accidents caused by distracted driving.

The article presents a number of arguments against such action, but the point is an interesting one, and it is an area that people should consider carefully.

Read the piece here:  http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/what-if-insurers-didnt-pay-for-crashes-caused-by-texting/

Distraction Dangers

Mobiledia presents findings from a Drexel University study, showing that iPods and similar music devices are twice as dangerous as cell phones for drivers.

Researchers used a computerised driving simulator to perform the small scale study, the first to analyse the effects of using MP3 players while driving. All 12 participants left their lanes, increased their speeds, and followed other cars too closely when scrolling through the iPod looking for media.

Knowing how distracting cell phones can be, it may not be surprising that using an iPod while driving can also be distracting. More surprising is the size of the effect, said researcher Dario Salvucci, pointing out that scrolling for songs on an iPod proved twice as dangerous as dialing a cell phone.

Articles like this are of particular interest here, as computer/laptop use presents the same (and more) distraction potential than mp3 players, and use of these devices is set to increase.

Read the article here:  http://www.mobiledia.com/news/123163.html

 This update has been brought to you by Blank-IT, the original and best in-vehicle computer distracted driving solution.  To find out how we can help your company address your legislative and OH&S requirements, contact Blank-IT on +61 8 9486 7122.

Permanent link to this article: http://blog.blank-it.com/distracted-driving-in-the-news-january-2012/

Jan
04

2010 Road Fatality & Injury Data Released – Lowest Traffic Fatalities for 6 Decades but Distracted Driving Continues to Kill.

U.S. Transportation Secretary LaHood Announces
Lowest Level Of Annual Traffic Fatalities In More Than Six Decades
Updated 2010 FARS data includes new measure of ‘distraction-affected’ fatalities;
national attitude survey offers additional insight into problem of distracted driving

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced updated 2010 fatality and injury data showing that highway deaths fell to 32,885 for the year, the lowest level since 1949. The record-breaking decline in traffic fatalities occurred even as American drivers traveled nearly 46 billion more miles during the year, an increase of 1.6 percent over the 2009 level.

“While we have more work to do to continue to protect American motorists, these numbers show we’re making historic progress when it comes to improving safety on our nation’s roadways,” said Secretary LaHood. “Thanks to the tireless work of our safety agencies and partner organizations over the past few decades, to save lives and reduce injuries, we’re saving lives, reducing injuries, and building the foundation for what we hope will be even greater success in the future.”

The updated information released by the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) today indicates 2010 also saw the lowest fatality rate ever recorded, with 1.10 deaths per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 2010, down from 1.15 deaths per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 2009. Other key statistics include:

  • Fatalities declined in most categories in 2010, including for occupants of passenger cars and light trucks (including SUVs, minivans and pickups).
  • Deaths in crashes involving drunk drivers dropped 4.9 percent in 2010, taking 10,228 lives compared to 10,759 in 2009.
  • Fatalities rose among pedestrians, motorcycle riders, and large truck occupants.

New Measure of Fatalities Related to Distracted Driving

NHTSA also unveiled a new measure of fatalities related to distracted driving today, called “distraction-affected crashes.” Introduced for 2010 as part of a broader effort by the agency to refine its data collection to get better information about the role of distraction in crashes, the new measure is designed to focus more narrowly on crashes in which a driver was most likely to have been distracted. While NHTSA’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) previously recorded a broad range of potential distractions, such as careless driving and cell phone present in the vehicle, the new measure focuses on distractions that are most likely to affect crash involvement, such as distraction by dialing a cellular phone or texting and distraction by an outside person/event. New data released today by NHTSA using its refined methodology show an estimated 3,092 fatalities in distraction-affected crashes in 2010.

The NHTSA effort to refine distraction data is similar to a step taken with alcohol information in FARS data for 2006. Prior to 2006, FARS reported “alcohol-related crashes,” which was defined as crashes in which a driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist had a blood alcohol level of .01 or higher. In an effort to focus on crashes in which alcohol was most likely to be a causative factor, NHTSA introduced the new measure, “alcohol-impaired driving crashes,” with a more narrow definition including only those crashes in which a driver or motorcycle rider had a blood alcohol level of .08 or above, the legal limit in every state.

“Even as we celebrate the incredible gains we’re making in reducing traffic fatalities, we recognize our responsibility to improve our understanding of the dangers that continue to threaten drivers and passengers,” said NHTSA Administrator David Strickland. “That’s why, under the leadership of Secretary LaHood, NHTSA is working to refine the way we collect data on distracted driving and laying the groundwork for additional research to capture real-world information on this risky behavior.”

While the explicit change in methodology means the new measure cannot be compared to the 5,474 “distraction-related” fatalities reported in 2009, other NHTSA data offer some indication that driver distraction continues to be a significant problem. The agency’s nationwide observational survey of drivers in traffic remains unchanged between 2009 and 2010, with 5 percent of drivers seen talking on handheld phones. In addition, given ongoing challenges in capturing the scope of the problem—including individuals’ reluctance to admit behavior, lack of witnesses, and in some cases the death of the driver—NHTSA believes the actual number of crashes that involve distracted driving could be higher.

National Attitude Survey on Distracted Driving

A new national NHTSA survey offers additional insights into how drivers behave when it comes to texting and cell phone use while behind the wheel and their perceptions of the safety risks of distracted driving. Survey respondents indicated they answer calls on most trips; they acknowledge few driving situations when they would not use the phone or text; and yet they feel unsafe when riding in vehicles in which the driver is texting and they support bans on texting and cell phone use. These findings provide further evidence that distracted driving is a complex problem that is both hard to measure and difficult to address given conflicting public attitudes and behaviors.

“The findings from our new attitude survey help us understand why some people continue to make bad decisions about driving distracted—but what’s clear from all of the information we have is that driver distraction continues to be a major problem,” said Administrator Strickland. “We need to maintain our focus on this issue through education, laws, enforcement, and vehicle design to help keep drivers’ attention on the road.”

Among the findings, more than three-quarters of drivers report that they are willing to answer calls on all, most, or some trips. Drivers also report that they rarely consider traffic situations when deciding when to use their phone.

While most drivers said they are willing to answer a call and many will send a text while driving, almost all of these same drivers reported that they would feel very unsafe as a passenger if their driver was sending or receiving text messages. Over one-third report that they would feel very unsafe if their driver was using a handheld phone.

Continuing Data Refinement

NHTSA’s adoption of the new “distraction-affected crash” measure for the 2010 FARS data is one step in a continuing effort to focus in on driver distraction and separate it from other issues. As part of its commitment to reduce the problem of distracted driving, NHTSA will continue to look for improved data sources. While police reports of serious crashes are an important source, they are limited by the evidence available to the officer. As a result, the agency is working to optimize information from crash reports by improving reporting forms and officer training. In addition, NHTSA will analyze new data on driver distraction from a new naturalistic study in which about 2,000 cars will be fitted with cameras and other equipment that will record driver behavior over a period of two years. Researchers will be able to use these data to associate driver behaviors with crash involvement. Data from this study will be available in 2014.

Source: http://distraction.gov/content/press-release/2011/12-8.html

Additional Material:

Permanent link to this article: http://blog.blank-it.com/2010-road-fatality-injury-data-released-distracted-driving-continues-to-kill/

Dec
20

Distracted Driving Addiction Compared to Smoking

Following on from our last article regarding the NTSB’s call to ban all electronic devices for drivers, the New York Times reports a distinct change in the way authorities see the whole issue of driver distraction.

Deborah Hersman, chair of the NTSB, talked about the “Addiction” of Distracted Driving and compared it to smoking.

This shift in approach is in-line with a growing feeling among scientists and researchers that the use of phones and computers can be compulsive, both emotionally and physically, which helps explain why drivers may have trouble turning off their devices even if they want to.

Developments like this emphasise the requirement for technology based solutions which need to be used in conjunction with legislation and education.

Read the article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/18/us/reframing-the-debate-over-using-phones-while-driving.html?_r=1

 

Blank-IT helps your business enforce policies covering computer use in vehicles of all types, by disabling or limiting computer functionality when movement is detected. Blank-IT doesn’t rely on GPS or other 3rd party input, is easily installed and can be calibrated to suit different working environments.

Find out more today at Blank-IT - or contact us on 08 9486 7122 (if calling from outside Australia: +61 8 9486 7122).

Permanent link to this article: http://blog.blank-it.com/distracted-driving-addiction-compared-to-smoking/

Older posts «